Republicans put short odds on Indiana 5th District win
- Polymarket prices only 15% on the Republican Party winning the Indiana 5th Congressional District House seat.
- The news that Republicans are spending defensively in races once considered safe is consistent with this contract's pricing, IN-05 is already treated as a likely Democratic hold.
- Contrast with IN-08, which Polymarket prices at 94% Republican, illustrating how the market is sorting Indiana districts: some are genuinely competitive, others are not.
- Resolves via UMA oracle on the certified election result; if the race is contested or subject to a recount, settlement timing could slip past the standard November 3 election night.
- story
- Republicans are pouring money into more than three dozen House races previously considered safe after internal polling showed unexpected vulnerability.exa_search → jgiesler · as_of 2026-09-27T13:30:43+00:00 [mediated]
- publisher
- jgiesler
- published_at
- 2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z
- interp
- Polymarket's 15% on IN-05 versus 94% on IN-08 shows prediction markets are doing granular district-level sorting that aggregate 'Republicans are on offense' headlines obscure.llm_judge_cm_signal_v1 [editorial]
News-cycle wires publish on coverage, not editorial selection — the day’s top stories matched to the prediction markets pricing them, so nothing is cherry-picked.
- judge_engine
none — deterministic news-cycle scan- judge_verdict
- auto_published
- judge_confidence
- n/a — no judge gate (deterministic publishing)
- prompt_template
news_cycle_v1github · auditable- match_method
entity_slug_match (mechanical)
Every wire traces back to the ClearMarket event it is built on, and out to each venue’s own market page — so any figure here can be verified at its source.
- venue_a
- polymarket · 0x98f22f0ec396ec65364048a14c0b30f3a4f79065ab26581a516b5fa570253d51
AI grounded search reads embedded JSON-LD in HTML. Developers query REST. Agentic AI clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor) call MCP tools. AI crawlers index via /llms.txt. Same canonical record at every surface.
| HTML | browsers, AI grounded search, crawlers (contains embedded JSON-LD @type: Dataset) | https://clearmarket.fyi/signals/gop-wins-in-05-polymarket-15-2026-09-27/ |
| JSON | REST API for developers | https://clearmarket.fyi/signals/gop-wins-in-05-polymarket-15-2026-09-27.json |
| MCP | agentic AI tool call (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue) | clearmarket.get_signal("gop-wins-in-05-polymarket-15-2026-09-27") |
| AGENT | AI crawler discovery index | /llms.txt |
PM data: platform APIs (hourly refresh). News context: retrieved with source citations. Editorial judgment: LLM judge with prompt template versioned per wire type. Per-claim provenance inline above; full per-field provenance map at the JSON endpoint under field_provenance.
raw JSON record · same payload returned by REST endpoint {
"$schema": "https://clearmarket.fyi/schema/signal/v1.json",
"provenance_version": "0.2.0",
"record_id": "CMSIG2026092707",
"published_at": "2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"detection": "news_cycle",
"category_tag": "MOMENTUM_REPRICING",
"secondary_tags": [],
"pre_news_classification": "concurrent",
"target_event_id": "CM-EVT-2Y2596TYD9",
"target_event_slug": "in-05-house-election-winner",
"event_question": "Will the Republican Party win the Indiana 5th Congressional District House seat in the 2026 general election?",
"bullets": [
"Polymarket prices only 15% on the Republican Party winning the Indiana 5th Congressional District House seat.",
"The news that Republicans are spending defensively in races once considered safe is consistent with this contract's pricing, IN-05 is already treated as a likely Democratic hold.",
"Contrast with IN-08, which Polymarket prices at 94% Republican, illustrating how the market is sorting Indiana districts: some are genuinely competitive, others are not.",
"Resolves via UMA oracle on the certified election result; if the race is contested or subject to a recount, settlement timing could slip past the standard November 3 election night."
],
"atomic_claims": [
{
"type": "news_event",
"field_provenance": {
"story": {
"tier": "mediated",
"method": "exa_search",
"source": "jgiesler",
"source_url": "https://srnnews.com/republicans-pour-money-into-dozens-of-us-house-races-previously-considered-safe/",
"retrieved_at": "2026-09-27T13:30:43+00:00"
}
},
"significance": {
"threshold": 5,
"threshold_unit": "rank",
"passed": true,
"reason": "surfaced in the daily Exa news-cycle scan; mechanically matched to an active polymarket market"
},
"story": "Republicans are pouring money into more than three dozen House races previously considered safe after internal polling showed unexpected vulnerability.",
"publisher": "jgiesler",
"published_at": "2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"source_url": "https://srnnews.com/republicans-pour-money-into-dozens-of-us-house-races-previously-considered-safe/"
},
{
"type": "pm_response",
"field_provenance": {
"notes": {
"tier": "editorial",
"method": "llm_judge_cm_signal_v1"
}
},
"notes": "Polymarket's 15% on IN-05 versus 94% on IN-08 shows prediction markets are doing granular district-level sorting that aggregate 'Republicans are on offense' headlines obscure."
}
],
"evaluation": {
"judge_engine": "none — deterministic news-cycle scan",
"judge_verdict": "auto_published",
"judge_confidence": null,
"prompt_template": "news_cycle_v1"
},
"citations": {
"internal": {
"cm_event": "/events/in-05-house-election-winner/",
"related": []
},
"external": {
"venue_a": null,
"venue_b": null,
"benchmark": null
}
},
"sources": [
{
"label": "jgiesler: Republicans pour money into dozens of US House races previously consid",
"url": "https://srnnews.com/republicans-pour-money-into-dozens-of-us-house-races-previously-considered-safe/",
"published_at": "2026-09-27T00:00:00.000Z",
"retrieved_at": "2026-09-27T13:30:43+00:00"
}
],
"field_provenance": {
"pm_data": "polymarket_api",
"news_context": "exa_search",
"editorial_judgment": "cm_signal_llm_judge"
}
}
PROVENANCE PROTOCOL v0.2 · [direct] venue api · [mediated] grounded web fetch + source url · [derived] computed from listed inputs · [editorial] versioned llm judgment · full spec /schema/provenance/v1