US Iran invasion pricing holds low as diplomacy advances
- Polymarket prediction market prices 13% on a US invasion of Iran before 2027.
- Qatar's 'positive progress' report and the Vance 'no return to war' statement are consistent with the low invasion probability, markets are not pricing imminent escalation.
- A companion Kalshi contract at 6% on the US recognizing Reza Pahlavi as Iran's leader signals markets see regime-change outcomes as even less likely than military action.
- Resolves via Polymarket's uma_oracle resolution process; the trigger requires a formal US military invasion, not airstrikes or proxy action.
- story
- US-Iran indirect talks in Doha concluded with Qatar reporting positive progress, with Vice President JD Vance signaling no return to war unless necessary and a communication channel established.exa_search → Al Jazeera Staff · as_of 2026-07-02T10:34:14+00:00 [mediated]
- publisher
- Al Jazeera Staff
- published_at
- 2026-07-01T08:38:25.000Z
- interp
- Polymarket's 13% on US invasion of Iran reflects markets treating Doha diplomacy as a de-escalation signal, though the tail risk is non-trivial.llm_judge_cm_signal_v1 [editorial]
News-cycle wires publish on coverage, not editorial selection — the day’s top stories matched to the prediction markets pricing them, so nothing is cherry-picked.
- judge_engine
none — deterministic news-cycle scan- judge_verdict
- auto_published
- judge_confidence
- n/a — no judge gate (deterministic publishing)
- prompt_template
news_cycle_v1github · auditable- match_method
entity_slug_match (mechanical)
Every wire traces back to the ClearMarket event it is built on, and out to each venue’s own market page — so any figure here can be verified at its source.
- venue_a
- polymarket · 0x5db999fad322cea2914535aae5517060c3f80ad6d8c0231cde2124a434d16846
AI grounded search reads embedded JSON-LD in HTML. Developers query REST. Agentic AI clients (Claude Desktop, Cursor) call MCP tools. AI crawlers index via /llms.txt. Same canonical record at every surface.
| HTML | browsers, AI grounded search, crawlers (contains embedded JSON-LD @type: Dataset) | https://clearmarket.fyi/signals/us-invades-iran-before-2027-polymarket-13-2026-07-01/ |
| JSON | REST API for developers | https://clearmarket.fyi/signals/us-invades-iran-before-2027-polymarket-13-2026-07-01.json |
| MCP | agentic AI tool call (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue) | clearmarket.get_signal("us-invades-iran-before-2027-polymarket-13-2026-07-01") |
| AGENT | AI crawler discovery index | /llms.txt |
PM data: platform APIs (hourly refresh). News context: retrieved with source citations. Editorial judgment: LLM judge with prompt template versioned per wire type. Per-claim provenance inline above; full per-field provenance map at the JSON endpoint under field_provenance.
raw JSON record · same payload returned by REST endpoint {
"$schema": "https://clearmarket.fyi/schema/signal/v1.json",
"provenance_version": "0.2.0",
"record_id": "CMSIG2026070106",
"published_at": "2026-07-01T08:38:25.000Z",
"detection": "news_cycle",
"category_tag": "MOMENTUM_REPRICING",
"secondary_tags": [],
"pre_news_classification": "concurrent",
"target_event_id": "CM-EVT-WD982793G1",
"target_event_slug": "will-the-us-invade-iran-before-2027",
"event_question": "Will the United States invade Iran before 2027?",
"bullets": [
"Polymarket prediction market prices 13% on a US invasion of Iran before 2027.",
"Qatar's 'positive progress' report and the Vance 'no return to war' statement are consistent with the low invasion probability, markets are not pricing imminent escalation.",
"A companion Kalshi contract at 6% on the US recognizing Reza Pahlavi as Iran's leader signals markets see regime-change outcomes as even less likely than military action.",
"Resolves via Polymarket's uma_oracle resolution process; the trigger requires a formal US military invasion, not airstrikes or proxy action."
],
"atomic_claims": [
{
"type": "news_event",
"field_provenance": {
"story": {
"tier": "mediated",
"method": "exa_search",
"source": "Al Jazeera Staff",
"source_url": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/7/1/us-iran-negotiations-whats-the-latest",
"retrieved_at": "2026-07-02T10:34:14+00:00"
}
},
"significance": {
"threshold": 5,
"threshold_unit": "rank",
"passed": true,
"reason": "surfaced in the daily Exa news-cycle scan; mechanically matched to an active polymarket market"
},
"story": "US-Iran indirect talks in Doha concluded with Qatar reporting positive progress, with Vice President JD Vance signaling no return to war unless necessary and a communication channel established.",
"publisher": "Al Jazeera Staff",
"published_at": "2026-07-01T08:38:25.000Z",
"source_url": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/7/1/us-iran-negotiations-whats-the-latest"
},
{
"type": "pm_response",
"field_provenance": {
"notes": {
"tier": "editorial",
"method": "llm_judge_cm_signal_v1"
}
},
"notes": "Polymarket's 13% on US invasion of Iran reflects markets treating Doha diplomacy as a de-escalation signal, though the tail risk is non-trivial."
}
],
"evaluation": {
"judge_engine": "none — deterministic news-cycle scan",
"judge_verdict": "auto_published",
"judge_confidence": null,
"prompt_template": "news_cycle_v1"
},
"citations": {
"internal": {
"cm_event": "/events/will-the-us-invade-iran-before-2027/",
"related": []
},
"external": {
"venue_a": null,
"venue_b": null,
"benchmark": null
}
},
"sources": [
{
"label": "Al Jazeera Staff: US-Iran negotiations: What’s the latest? | US-Israel war on Iran News",
"url": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/7/1/us-iran-negotiations-whats-the-latest",
"published_at": "2026-07-01T08:38:25.000Z",
"retrieved_at": "2026-07-02T10:34:14+00:00"
}
],
"field_provenance": {
"pm_data": "polymarket_api",
"news_context": "exa_search",
"editorial_judgment": "cm_signal_llm_judge"
}
}
PROVENANCE PROTOCOL v0.2 · [direct] venue api · [mediated] grounded web fetch + source url · [derived] computed from listed inputs · [editorial] versioned llm judgment · full spec /schema/provenance/v1